FRANCES STRUCK, APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Odom v. The Deltona Corp., 341 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1976)
  …rs have muni-ments of title purporting to confer valid unconditional ownership. Though the statutes are not specifically mentioned in the Court’s opinion, their principles were applied in Osceola County v. Triple E Devel [*985] opment Co., Fla.1956, 90 So. 2d 600, with a resulting finding that certain lakes were nonnavigable and privately owned. “17. Another concept of the mentioned statutes is the recognition of legal or equitable estoppel, or both, against the state and the public to assert a claim in pro…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Duval v. Thomas, 114 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 1959)
  …rine did apply and affirmed the chancellor’s decision. On behalf of one of petitioners it is asserted that the decision of the District Court of Appeal collides with the ruling of this court in Osceola County v. Triple E. Development Company, Fla., 90 So. 2d 600, in which they think this court embraced the common law rule because of the language that inland lakes are subject to private ownership and when so owned are not accessible to the public or adjacent owners whose titles extend only to the water’s edg…
• Duval v. Thomas, 107 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)
  …ffs from making any use of the lake other than the very small, shallow portion overlying their land. There is one case that both defendants have cited in the briefs and that is the case of Osceola County v. Triple E. Development Company, Fla. 1956, 90 So. 2d 600. We have read this case but in its final analysis that case is only authority for the proposition that where a lake is entirely owned by one party the court would enjoin an attempted eminent domain which was for the purpose of building a roadway for…

Authorities Cited

• Richmond v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 58 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 1952)