BILOXI CASINO CORPORATION D/B/A CASINO MAGIC, APPELLANT,

v.

MICHAEL H. WOLF, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Biel REO, LLC v. Barefoot Cottages Dev. Co. LLC, 156 So. 3d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
  …2d 1109, 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Once these prerequisites are met, a judgment creditor “is entitled to the proceedings supplementary,” § 56.29(1); a court cannot deny a motion that meets the statutory prerequisites. See Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf, 900 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). After initiation of proceedings supplementary, a judgment creditor may pursue assets held by the debtor, § 56.29(l)-(2); pursue the debtor’s assets held by another, so long as the property is not exempt from execution, § 56.29(…
• Longo v. Associated Limousine Servs., Inc., 236 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
  ….29(1), “the judgment creditor is entitled to these proceedings supplementary to execution.” § 56.29(1), Fla. Stat. (2016). “Upon a showing of the statutory prerequisites, the court has no discretion to deny the motion." Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf, 900 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Here, the trial court erred in denying the judgment creditor's request for proceedings supplementary. The judgment creditor's motion and affidavit satisfied the requirements of section 56.29(1), so the judgment creditor was ent…
• Moffatt & Nichol, Inc. v. B.E.A. Int'l Corp., Inc., 48 So. 3d 896 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …82) (finding petitioning creditors lacked standing to challenge transfer as fraudulent or preferential because such statutory remedies could be asserted only by a bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession). . Citing to Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf, 900 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), and Continental Cigar Corp. v. Edelman & Co., 397 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), Moffatt also argues the trial court had no discretion to deny proceedings supplementary to implead third parties. Although Biloxi states that "[u]p…