VINCENT KING, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Roth v. Roth, 973 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …ring the dissolution proceedings [*585] results in the dissipation of a marital asset. In that case, the misconduct may serve as a basis for assigning the dissipated asset to the spending spouse when calculating equitable distribution. Levy v. Levy, 900 So. 2d 737, 746 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Romano v. Romano, 632 So. 2d 207, 210 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). When considering whether the dissipation of an asset resulted from misconduct, the question for the trial court is whether “one spouse use[d] marital funds for his…
• Winder v. Dian A. Winder, 152 So. 3d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
  …oceedings results in the dissipation of a marital [*839] asset. In that case, the misconduct may serve as a basis for assigning the dissipated asset to the spending spouse when calculating equitable distribution.” Id. at 584-85 (citing Levy v. Levy, 900 So. 2d 737, 746 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Romano v. Romano, 632 So. 2d 207, 210 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)). In Walker v. Walker, 85 So. 3d 553, 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), this court held: [I]n order to determine that a spouse has dissipated marital assets, the trial court…
• Dravis v. Dravis, 170 So. 3d 849 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
  …t reason, we must reverse the equitable distribution portion of the final judgment. See id. at 741 (reversing judgment where “[ajrguably, the trial court could have made a finding of misconduct based on this evidence, but it did not”); Levy v. Levy, 900 So. 2d 737, 746 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (reversing judgment where “[t]he trial court did not make a finding of fact in the final judgment that the Wife was guilty of misconduct with regard to the depletion or dissipation of the portion of the lump-sum payment that…

Authorities Cited

• Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
• Callvester Smith v. State, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)