MICHAEL MIDDLETON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2005-05-04
No. 3D05-167
Before GREEN, WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ.
900 So. 2d 770 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Butts v. State, 898 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 2005); Cooper v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Middleton v. State, 95 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
    …denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 915 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (table) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 901 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 900 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 890 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 879 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (table) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw