MICHAEL REILE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Michael Reile appealed the modification of his criminal sentence after he was already sentenced. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify the sentence more than 60 days after it was imposed, and the court therefore reversed the modification and remanded for reinstatement of the original sentence.
A trial court lacks jurisdiction to modify or change a sentence more than 60 days after sentencing. The February 19, 2004 modification was therefore void, and the original November 21, 2003 sentence must be reinstated.
[1] A trial court loses jurisdiction to modify or reduce a legal sentence after sixty days have elapsed since the sentence was imposed.
[2] A court cannot modify a sentence after the expiration of the sixty-day period provided by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c).
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a trial court may modify or reduce a legal sentence imposed by it within sixty days after the sentence is imposed.”
Establishes the jurisdictional time limit for sentence modifications
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn November 21, 2003, Reile was sentenced to 364 days in jail with credit for 198 days time served, with $50 in court costs, a $40 public defender app…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdiction To Modify Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
HAZOURI, J.
On November 21, 2003, appellant, Michael Reile, was sentenced pursuant to a negotiated plea to 364 days in jail with credit for 198 days time served. The disposition order imposed $50 in court costs, a $40 public defender application fee, and a $50 public defender fee.
On February 19, 2004, a hearing was held before a different judge at which the disposition sheet was modified to impose a $700 public defender lien which was the appropriate amount pursuant to the administrative order of the chief judge. We reverse. Appellant objected to any modification of the sentence arguing that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because more than sixty days had elapsed since appellant was sentenced and the sentence could not now be modified. The state agreed with appellant’s argument but nevertheless, the trial court modified the sentence and appellant filed this appeal.
Appellant presents the same argument on appeal. Under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a trial court may modify or reduce a legal sentence imposed by it within sixty days after the sentence is imposed. In this case, the hearing held in February was more than sixty days after the imposition of the original sentence. However, “[ajfter 60 days, the court no longer has jurisdiction to modify or change a sentence.” State v. Nichols, 629 So. 2d 970, 972 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
Section 938.29, Florida Statutes (2003), provides for the liability of a defendant for his/her public defender fees. It further provides that the court shall determine the amount of the obligation, section 938.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2003), and “[ujpon entering a judgment of conviction, the defendant shall be liable to pay the costs in full after the judgment of conviction becomes final.” § 938.29(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003).
Pursuant to rules and statutes,1 the chief judge of the circuit set the rate for public defender fees. Additionally, Administrative Order III-98-D-8 provides:
3. ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS: Pursuant to Florida Statute 938.29, the court having jurisdiction over any defendant who has been determined to be guilty of a criminal act by a court or jury, or through a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, and who has received the assistance of the Public Defenders office ... shall assess attorneys fees and costs against the defendant at the sentencing hearing.
(Emphasis added.)
For the assessment of public defender fees, this provision presumes there is jurisdiction over the defendant. At the point when the trial court sua sponte modified appellant’s sentence, it was without jurisdiction. We, therefore, reverse and remand this case to the trial court to vacate the order entered on February 19, 2004, nunc pro tunc November 21, 2003, and to reinstate the original sentence imposed on November 21, 2003.
REVERSED.
WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur. . Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.050 (2003); §§ 27.52 and 27.56, Fla. Stat. (2003).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. State, 955 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…PER CURIAM. We dismiss the appeal of a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) as a non-appealable order. See Reile v. State, 901 So. 2d 196, 197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Grosse v. State, 511 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). STEVENSON, C.J., TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Nichols, 629 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)