CURTIS FRANK BROOKS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• G.C. v. State, 944 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …endant to which the defendant did not specifically enter a plea.”). Therefore, to obtain a restitution award for the loss of the vehicle, the State had to show that the loss would not have occurred but for the trespass. See, e.g., Socorro v. State, 901 So. 2d 940, 941 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“[I]f ‘but for’ the criminal episode, damages would not have been incurred by the victim, restitution is proper.”); Davis v. State, 741 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (reversing restitution for stolen items when defendant p…
• Rachelle Marie James v. State, 223 So. 3d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
  …s reflected in the information and/or by the factual basis for the plea.” [*291] Malarkey v. State, 975 So. 2d 538, 540-41 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (emphasis added); accord A.D. v. State, 152 So. 3d 798, 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); see also Socorro v. State, 901 So. 2d 940, 941 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“Absent a causal link and significant relationship between the loss for which restitution is ordered and the defendant’s offense, restitution may not be ordered for any loss which resulted from an unrelated offense for whic…
• K.N. v. State, 61 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
  …minal mischief or to theft, both of which were abandoned. Therefore, to obtain restitution for the loss or theft of the missing cash and jewelry, the State had to show that the loss would not have occurred but for the trespass. See Socorro v. State, 901 So. 2d 940, 941 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“[I]f ‘but for’ the criminal episode, damages would not have been incurred by the victim, restitution is proper.”); Davis v. State, 741 So. 2d 1213, 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (reversing restitution for stolen items when the d…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Richardson v. State, 826 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
• Hughes v. State, 826 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)