WALTER SCHNEIDER, APPELLANT,

v.

BEVERLY JEAN SCHNEIDER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Markeria Roshawn Hillsman v. State, 159 So. 3d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
  …issues where those attitudes are “essential to a determination of whether challenges for cause or peremptory challenges are to be made.... ” Walker v. State, 724 So. 2d 1232, 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (citation omitted). See also Ingrassia v. State, 902 So. 2d 357, 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“[A] court may not preclude a party from inquiry into bias bearing on a matter that is at thé heart of the defendant’s case.”). Here, the trial court restricted defense counsel’s examination as to the prospective jurors’ a…
• Baccari v. State, 145 So. 3d 958 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …se counsel accepted the panel just a few transcript pages after the court asked if there was any other business that needed to be addressed.” Id. The Third District found the issue was preserved for appellate review. Id. See also Ingrassia v. State, 902 So. 2d 357, 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (finding the defendant’s objection preserved because before the jury was impaneled, “the trial court specifically and repeatedly reassured counsel, in the course of the extensive colloquy, that the issue was on the record an…
• Harrison v. State, 172 So. 3d 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …s “if they had an open mind to defenses in general and whether they agreed that in life there are times when people feel they must take certain action and said action may be legally recognized as a defense to a criminal charge”); Ingrassia v. State, 902 So. 2d 357, 358-59 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (remanding for a new trial upon finding that the trial court abused its discretion by depriving the defendant of the opportunity to question prospective jurors about their possible bias against recantation where it “gave…

Authorities Cited

• LYN v. LYN, 884 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)