CHARLES C. BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES C. BROWN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
903 So. 2d 251
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 32 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Thomas v. State, 838 So. 2d 535 (Fla.2003) (stating that as long as a trial court’s findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact; likewise it will not substitute its judgment for the trial court’s on the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court); Blanco v. State, 702 So. 2d 1250 (Fla.1997).
SHARP, W., GRIFFIN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Karem Elena Romo v. Amedex Ins. Co., 930 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…ntation was made with the purpose of inducing another person to rely upon it; (4) that the person relied on the misrepresentation to his detriment; and (5) that this reliance caused damages. Biscayne Inv. Group, Ltd. v. Guarantee Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 903 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Elders v. United Methodist Church, 793 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Chino Elec., Inc. v. United States Fid. Guar. Co., 578 So. 2d 320, 322 n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). A review of the Complaint indicates that these elements are a…
-
Found. Health v. Westside EKG Assocs., 944 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 2006)…each of the contract by a contracting party; and (4) damages to the third party resulting from the breach.” Networkip, LLC v. Spread Enters., Inc., 922 So. 2d 355, 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (citing Biscayne Inv. Group, Ltd. v. Guar. Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 903 So. 2d 251, 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)). While we decline to decide from the limited record on appeal whether Westside’s complaint is sufficient to establish each of these elements, we find no support for the HMOs’ assertion that Westside is precluded as a matter…
-
Networkip, LLC v. Spread Enters., Inc., 922 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…ing parties that the contract primarily and directly benefit the third party; (3) breach of the contract by a contracting party; and (4) damages to the third party resulting from the breach. Biscayne Inv. Group, Ltd. v. Guarantee Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 903 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). A third party is considered a beneficiary to the contract only if the contracting parties intend to primarily and directly benefit the third party. Cigna Fire Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Leonard, 645 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). A…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Blanco v. State, 702 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 1997)
- Thomas v. State, 838 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 2003)