MARTIN L. PRESSLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARTIN L. PRESSLEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
903 So. 2d 1053
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. See Hallman v. State, 845 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED.
DAVIS, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dunklin v. State, 135 So. 3d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…llant’s probation and the judgment and sentence. However, because the record provides no indication that the trial court entered a written order of revocation of probation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. See Pressley v. State, 903 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Hallman v. State, 845 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions. LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and SWANSON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Hallman v. State, 845 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)