ROBERT J. OROVITZ, AND ROBERT J. OROVITZ P.A. D/B/A HAYT, HAYT, AND LANDAU P.A., APPELLANTS,
v.
DAVID E. BORACK, APPELLEE
ROBERT J. OROVITZ, AND ROBERT J. OROVITZ P.A. D/B/A HAYT, HAYT, AND LANDAU P.A., APPELLANTS,
DAVID E. BORACK, APPELLEE
904 So. 2d 519
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Partnership Agreement Construction
Jury Verdict Interpretation
Partnership Agreement
Statutory Interpretation
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Partnership Agreement Construction cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
.The Shareholder Agreement provided that
6. Either party may terminate this agreement with six months notice. In the event, this agreement is terminated, [Bo-rack] agrees to sell his stock to [Orovitz] for thirty five percent (35%) of the cash and receivable, less payables, as of the date of notice.
The First Addendum to Shareholder Agreement provided, in pertinent part, that
3.[Borack] acknowledges that the books and records reflect that the firm owes [Orovitz] [$282,000.00]. The parties and the firm agree that this loan will be repaid as a firm debt....
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Borack v. Orovitz, 963 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…grant Orovitz’s motion for fees. This Court, however, already rejected this argument when it denied Borack’s rule 9.400(c) motion in which he raised the same argument. We therefore affirm the award entered in Orovitz’s favor. . Orovitz v. Borack, 904 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).…
Authorities Cited
- Phillips v. Ostrer, 481 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Cory v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 257 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 1971)
- U.S. Home Corp. v. Suncoast Utils., Inc., 454 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Burgess v. Mid-Florida Serv., 609 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
- Idilia C. Balsera and Branislav Obrenovic v. A.B.D.M. & P. Corp., 511 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Brod v. Ira L. Adler, 570 So. 2d 1312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)