DAVID ALEXANDER MASTERS, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the probation revocation and sentences but corrected a clerical error in the written sentence that incorrectly referenced Manatee County as the source of prior state prison sentences.
A probation revocation order and sentences are affirmed except for correction of a clerical error in the written sentence document.
The appellant was found to have violated probation and received sentences that were to run concurrently with state prison sentences he was already ser…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clerical Error Correction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the order of revocation of probation, the judgment, and the sentences entered and imposed after the trial court found that the appellant had committed various violations of probation. We affirm the order, judgment and sentences, except as to an error which appears on page 6 of the appellant’s written sentence.
In imposing sentence, the trial court orally announced that the appellant’s sentences in the present case would run concurrently with state prison sentences the appellant was already serving. As the appellee concedes, the written sentence incorrectly indicates that the state prison sentences the appellant was already serving had been imposed in Manatee County. We therefore strike the reference to Manatee County from page 6 of the appellant’s written sentence, so that the pertinent remaining language appearing there will indicate that the appellant’s sentences in the present case will run concurrently with one another, and that the sentences in the present case will also run concurrently with the state prison sentences the appellant was already serving when the judgment and sentences were entered and imposed in the present case.
Accordingly, the order of revocation of probation, the judgment, and the sentences are affirmed, but the reference to Manatee County is stricken from the written sentence.
WOLF, C.J., ALLEN and BENTON, JJ., concur.