IRMA L. JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
v.
COOPERATIVE LEASING, INC., ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
IRMA L. JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
COOPERATIVE LEASING, INC., ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
905 So. 2d 76
Florida Supreme Court (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, to review Cooperative Leasing, Inc. v. Johnson, 872 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), based on express and direct conflict with Respess v. Carter, 585 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, C.J., and LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.'
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
THE Florida BAR v. Head, 27 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 2010)…s, 731 So. 2d 1249, 1252 (Fla.1999) (the motive behind the respondent’s action was not the determinative factor; rather, the issue was whether the respondent deliberately or knowingly engaged in the activity in question); see also Fla. Bar v. Brown, 905 So. 2d 76, 81 (Fla.2005); Fla. Bar v. Barley, 831 So. 2d 163, 169 (Fla.2002). The referee and bankruptcy court found that Head deliberately and knowingly requested $10,000 from the debtors’ refinancing and deliberately and knowingly filed the misleading Sugge…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Behm, 41 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 2010)…s held that “in order to sustain a violation of rule 4-8.4(c), the Bar must prove intent,” this Court has also stated that the intent ele [*148] ment can be satisfied “merely by showing that the conduct was deliberate or knowing.” Fla. Bar v. Brown, 905 So. 2d 76, 81 (Fla.2005); see also Fla. Bar v. Riggs, 944 So. 2d 167, 171 (Fla.2006) (holding intent, as an element for disciplining an attorney for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, is proven by establishing that…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Riggs, 944 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 2006)…stole the funds. In Florida Bar v. Fredericks, 731 So. 2d 1249 (Fla.1999), the Court stated that “in order to satisfy the element of intent it must only be shown that the conduct was deliberate or knowing.” Id. at 1252; see also Fla. Bar v. Brown, 905 So. 2d 76, 81 (Fla.2005); Fla. Bar v. Barley, 881 So. 2d 163, 169 (Fla.2002). In Fredericks, the motive behind the attorney’s action was not the determinative factor. Rather, the issue was whether the attorney deliberately or knowingly engaged in the activity…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 872 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Respess v. Fairley Kave Carter, 585 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)