ALAN P. WOODRUFF, APPELLANT,
v.
CAPE CORAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.; DON WILLIAMSON; FRED CULL; PAUL SANBORN; LESLIE SCOTT; JOHN HUNT; ROGER BUTLER; CORA GILBERT; EDMUND BAXA; AND FOLEY & LARDNER, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Court affirmed dismissal of fraud upon the court and abuse of process claims, holding that if any viable cause of action exists, it would be malicious prosecution, which cannot accrue until the underlying interpleader action is resolved in plaintiff's favor.
Allegations of fraud upon the court and abuse of process do not state a claim for abuse of process; any viable cause of action would be malicious prosecution, which cannot accrue until the underlying interpleader action is resolved in plaintiff's favor.
[1] A claim for malicious prosecution arising from the filing of an interpleader action cannot accrue until the underlying interpleader action is resolved in the plaintiff's…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWoodruff filed a complaint alleging fraud upon the court and abuse of process against Cape Coral Medical Center, its board members, and its lawyers, r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fraud On The Court cases and more on FLexlaw
ALTENBERND, Chief Judge.
Alan P. Woodruff appeals the dismissal of his first amended complaint, which sought to state a cause of action for “fraud upon the court” and abuse of process. These allegations relate to a separate pending action for interpleader. The defendant, Cape Coral Medical Center (Cape Coral), is a party in the interpleader and allegedly the entity that caused the action for interpleader to be hied. The other defendants in this lawsuit are members of Cape Coral’s board of directors and the lawyers who represent Cape Coral in the interpleader. We affirm the dismissal of Mr. Wood-ruffs complaint. Mr. Woodruffs allegations do not state a claim for an abuse of process. If Mr. Woodruff has a cause of action based upon these allegations, it will be one for malicious prosecution. See Blue v. Weinstein, 381 So. 2d 308, 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); see also Delgado v. Airlines Reporting Corp., 745 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Dorta v. Gaines, 605 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Cazares v. Church of Scientology, 444 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). That cause of action will not accrue unless and until the interpleader action is resolved in his favor. See Blue, 381 So. 2d at 311. Although the trial court dismissed the first amended complaint with prejudice because the complaint could not be amended to state a cause of action at this time, the dismissal was not intended to, nor do we interpret it as, prohibiting a malicious prosecution claim if indeed one could be stated upon the termination of the interpleader litigation.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Blue v. Weinstein, 381 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Cazares v. The Church OF Scientology OF Cal., Inc., 444 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Larry and Lotte Pick v. Gilbert, 605 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Gonzalo R. Dorta, Esq. v. Gaines, 605 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Amable Delgado v. Airlines Reporting Corp., 745 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)