HENRY HARVIN, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HENRY HARVIN, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
905 So. 2d 269
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2005)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to any right Harvin may have to challenge the voluntariness of his plea or the effectiveness of his counsel by filing a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…of the initial brief. Although Mr. Bizzell’s initial pro se motion was timely, the trial court, nevertheless, should have stricken it because Mr. Bizzell had counsel at the time. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472, 479 (Fla.2003); Coffelt v. State, 905 So. 2d 269, 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Lee v. State, 779 So. 2d 341, 342 n. 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Rodriguez v. State, 881 So. 2d 671, 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Compare Lopez v. State, 905 So. 2d 1045, 1047 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (exception for filing of pro se rule 3.…
-
Innocent Gedehomme v. State, 160 So. 3d 533 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…e public defender fee. A rule 3.800(b)(2) motion is the appropriate mechanism to seek relief from the erroneous imposition of costs. Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 574 (Fla.2008). The court struck Gedehomme’s motion pursuant to Coffelt v. State, 905 So. 2d 269, 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), concluding that because Gedehomme was counseled when his pro se motion was filed, it must be stricken. This was error because Gede-homme was not counseled for purposes of the motion based on appellate counsel’s filing an And…