MARK K. JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-11-10
No. 1D04-4347
BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
905 So. 2d 901 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Caution
Cited by 26 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Ivey v. Allstate Insurance Company, 774 So. 2d 679 (Fla.2000).

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Paul v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 68 So. 3d 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
    …order denying the first motion to set aside because it did not provide Ms. Goolsby with a copy. See Hall, 487 So. 2d 1147. The determination of the correct legal standard to apply is a question of law that we review de novo. Henderson v. Henderson, 905 So. 2d 901, 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“[A] [trial court’s] misconception of a controlling principle of law can constitute grounds for reversal”) (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979)). Because the trial judge ruled based on…
  • Todd v. Guillaume-Todd, 972 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
    …Weekly D182 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 5, 2007) (quoting Chirino v. Chirino, 710 So. 2d 696, 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)); Dorsett v. Dorsett, 902 So. 2d 947, 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). The standard of review of a question of law is de novo. Henderson v. Henderson, 905 So. 2d 901, 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). The Florida legislature has decreed that it is: ... the public policy of this state to assure that each minor child has frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parties separate or the marriage of the pa…
  • Medco Data, LLC v. Bailey, 152 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)). Consequently, “[t]he determination of the correct legal standard to apply is a question of law that we review de novo.” Paul v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 68 So. 3d 979, 986 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (quoting Henderson v. Henderson, 905 So. 2d 901, 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)). Here, although the trial court found the facts that would trigger the presumption of irreparable harm under section 542.335(l)(j), nothing in the record suggests that the court applied it. Despite finding that the restrict…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw