LORENZO COLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rendition Of Order cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the Appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated February 28, 2005, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed on January 21, 2005, appeals a non-appealablé order, which issued on January 6, 2005, and denied the Appellant’s motion for rehearing. Because the motion for rehearing is not subject to appellate review, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Carter v. State, 242 So. 2d 737, 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Fla.R.App.9.110(b). To the extent the Appellant argues that he is appealing the underlying order, his motion for rehearing was not timely filed within'15 days of the trial court’s order and, thus, did not delay rendition of the underlying final order. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(g); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h).
DISMISSED.
WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carratelli v. State, 915 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…. 1984), concerns the procedure for evaluating a party’s objection to a peremptory challenge on the ground that the challenge reflects racial bias. See also Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). . In Davis v. State, 905 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), the third district considered the merits of Davis' Neil objection and affirmed the conviction. The trial court’s overruling of Davis’ Neil objection to the prosecutor’s peremptory strike was based on the court’s erroneous recolle…
-
Mortellaro & Sinadinos, PLLC v. Countrywide Home Loans, 14 So. 3d 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…ideration, and/or Clarification or, in the Alternative, Motion for Relief from the November 18, 2008 Order.” An order on a motion for rehearing is not appealable in its own right. See Grant v. Jones, 933 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Cole v. State, 905 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). An authorized and timely motion for rehearing merely suspends the date of rendition of the order to which it was directed; it does not set in motion another controversy that will become the subject of a separate appeal. The ap…
-
Martin v. State, 136 So. 3d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…PER CURIAM. Dismissed. See Cole v. State, 905 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“Because the motion for rehearing is not subject to appellate review, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction.”). ROWE, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Carter v. State, 242 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)