TERRANCE D. MCCLENDON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2005-04-27
No. 4D05-879
FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
905 So. 2d 916 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dismissal of McClendon’s motion to correct illegal sentence alleging that the State’s “shotgun” notice of intent to seek enhanced penalties pursuant to § 775.084, Fla. Stat. did not provide him adequate notice of the classification and penalty he would be subject to upon conviction. This court has since determined in Washington v. State, 895 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), that such “shotgun” notices are adequate to notify a defendant that his entire criminal record is at issue, and we hold that McClendon is therefore not entitled to the relief requested in his motion.

FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bessard v. Marthe Renee Bessard, 40 So. 3d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
    …Enters., Inc., 604 So. 2d 807, 810 (Fla.1992) (holding “that the party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorney’s fees”); Boxer Max Corp. v. Cane A. Sucre, Inc., 905 So. 2d 916, 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The ‘prevailing party,’ for purposes of attorney’s fees, is a party which the trial court determines prevailed on significant issues in the litigation.”). Joseph contends that because the trial court never determined wheth…
  • Romaguera v. Tr. Mortg. LLC, 238 So. 3d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw