ROBERTO H. GONZALEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Roberto Hermino Gonzalez appeals an order denying his motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) for additional credit for time served.
When a trial court summarily denies a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), 3.850, or 3.853, this court’s standard of review is as follows. “On appeal from the denial of relief, unless the record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief, the order shall be reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). As the record now before us does not conclusively refute the appellant’s claim, we reverse the order and remand it for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Galindez v. State, 955 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 2007)…ry can be empaneled to decide facts relevant to sentencing. We already have held that Apprendi does not apply retroactively. See Hughes v. State, 901 So. 2d 837 (Fla.2005). Presumably, neither does its offspring, Blakely. See, e.g., Hicks v. State, 905 So. 2d 990, 991 (Fla. 3d DCA) (holding that because Apprendi does not apply retroactively, neither does Blakely), review denied, 917 So. 2d 193 (Fla.2005); Burrows v. State, 890 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (same), review denied, 914 So. 2d 952 (Fla.2005); Mc…
-
Irwin Hicks, Jr. v. State, 974 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…or the filing of a frivolous appeal. Petition denied. . Hicks v. State, 952 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (table); Hicks v. State, 939 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (table); Hicks v. State, 920 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (table); Hicks v. State, 905 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Hicks v. State, 901 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Hicks v. State, 875 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (3D04-1083) (table); Hicks v. State, 875 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (3D04-1071) (table); Hicks v. State, 831 So. 2d 188 (Fla.…
-
Baxter Tisdale v. State, 282 So. 3d 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…12) (citing McLin v. State, 827 So. 2d 948, 954 (Fla. 2002) (“To uphold the trial court’s summary denial of claims raised in a 3.850 motion, the claims must be either facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record.”)); see Gonzalez v. State, 905 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (applying a de novo standard of review to the summary denial of a postconviction motion filed pursuant to rule 3.853). LEGAL ANALYSIS I. Motion for Postconviction Relief Rule 3.850 provides a “two-year time limitation for filing m…