MAURICE A. WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Glenn Wright Homes (Delray) LLC v. Lowy, 18 So. 3d 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …. Although the documentary stamps were not affixed to the note until after the summary judgment, the trial court awarded attorney’s fees, seeming to conflict with this court’s statements in both Rappaport v. Hollywood Beach Resort Condominium Assn., 905 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), and Bonfiglio v. Banker’s Trust Co. of California, 944 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), that notes without documentary stamps attached are unenforceable by reason of section 201.08, Florida Statutes. Therefore, attorney’s fees i…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Akbar Nikooie v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 183 So. 3d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
  …ded). The en banc panel of the Fourth District Court of Appeal then concludes: The string of cases applying a prohibition against enforcement of promissory notes appear to misread the statute. See Rappaport [v. Hollywood Beach Resort Condo. Ass’n], 905 So. 2d 1024 [(Fla. 4th DCA 2005)]; Bonfiglio fv. Banker’s Trust Co. of Cal.], 944 So. 2d 1087 [ (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ]; Somma v. Metra Electronics Corp., 727 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Klein v. Royale Group, Ltd., 578 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Silber […
• Nicholson-Kenny Cap. Mgmt., Inc. v. Steinberg, 932 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …reflected in its filed notice to set the pretrial conference in accordance with the order setting trial. We have continually decried the use of “gotcha” litigation tactics. See, e.g., Gardner, Rappaport v. Hollywood Beach Resort Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 905 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Jenkins v. UBN Global Trading Corp., 886 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); A.J.; Berkman v. Foley, 709 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We again reiterate our disdain for such litigation conduct. Reversed and remanded for a trial…