STEPHEN E. CHIARELLO, M.D., PETITIONER,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RESPONDENT
STEPHEN E. CHIARELLO, M.D., PETITIONER,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RESPONDENT
906 So. 2d 341
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for review of non-final agency action is denied on the merits. See Daube v. Department of Health, 902 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morrow v. Frommer, 913 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…the court erred by failing to make adequate findings as to the earning ability of each parent and determining a guideline amount before ultimately exercising its discretion to deviate from the guideline suggestion. Id.; see also Navarro v. Navarro, 906 So. 2d 341, 342 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (holding that a determination by the trial court of a clear and definite amount for support is necessary in establishing a party’s ability to pay and in enforcing the obligation in future proceedings), and Escribano v. Covie…
Authorities Cited
- Daniel Campbell Daube, Jr., M.D. v. Dep't OF Health, 902 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)