HERBERT GOLDEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HERBERT GOLDEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
906 So. 2d 1161
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Ray v. State, 403 So. 2d 956, 961 (Fla.1981).
PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Jacksonville v. Twin Rests., Inc., 953 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…ee 397 So. 2d at 683 (“We hold that landowners have no compensable interest in traffic flow and that, in order to receive severance damages, any complained-of impairment must result directly from a taking.”). See also Dep’t of Transp. v. RFT P’ship, 906 So. 2d 1161, 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (reversing award of severance damages where “an isolated change [in grade] in an intersection on property that the DOT already owned” took place, because “the land taken ... does not fit within the [Lee County ] exception ..…
-
City OF Jacksonville v. Westland Park Assocs., II (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…e 397 So. 2d at 683 (“We hold that landowners have no compensable interest in. traffic flow and that, in order to receive severance damages, any complained-of impairment must result directly from a taking.”). See also Dep’t of Transp. v. RFT P’ship, 906 So. 2d 1161, 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (reversing award of severance damages where “an isolated change [in grade] in an intersection on property that the DOT already owned” took place, because “the land taken ... does not fit within the [Lee County ] exception ..…
Authorities Cited
- RAY v. State, 403 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 1981)