WAYNE WEEKS, AS CLAY COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, AND JIMMY WEEKS, AS CLAY COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE CROSSINGS AT FLEMING ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, A UNIT OF SPECIAL-PURPOSE GOVERNMENT, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellants’ response to the Court’s order of December 29, 2004, the Court has concluded that the order on appeal is not a final order. Specifically, because the lower tribunal reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount of interest due on the tax refund, judicial labor with regard to that non-collateral issue remains, and the order is consequently nonfinal. See generally S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 100 (Fla.1974); see also Dwain’s Foodland v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 738 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
ERVIN, WOLF, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Mondello v. Torres, 47 So. 3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…mony, a court must consider the factors set forth in section 61.08(2), Florida Statutes. When a marriage falls within the “gray area” of length, as here, no presumption in favor of or against an award of permanent alimony exists. Nichols v. Nichols, 907 So. 2d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citation omitted). To award lump sum alimony, the trial court must find 'a “special necessity.” Rosario v. Rosario, 945 So. 2d 629, 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (citing Porzio v. Porzio, 760 So. 2d 1075, 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000…
-
Stanislaw Matajek v. Leokadia Skowronska, 927 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…substantial evidence supporting the court’s findings on valuation for marital assets. See, e.g., Reddell v. Reddell, 899 So. 2d 1154, 1155-56 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (quoting Brock v. Brock, 690 So. 2d 737, 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)); Nichols v. Nichols, 907 So. 2d 620, 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). “This is the attorneys’ or prose parties’ burden. A trial judge cannot create findings out of thin air.” Reddell, 899 So. 2d at 1156 (quoting Brock, 690 So. 2d at 740). The parties presented scant evidence of value, but the…
-
Williams v. Williams, 923 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)…A 1996). In this case, the parties’ marriage falls in the upper range of “gray area” marriages where [*608] there is no presumption for or against an award of alimony. See Walker v. Walker, 818 So. 2d 711, 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Nichols v. Nichols, 907 So. 2d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Levy v. Levy, 862 So. 2d 48, 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The requirement of factual findings is especially important in this type of case because the trial court must make its determination based on an evaluation of the statutor…
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- S. L. T. Warehouse Co. v. Wilmott Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1974)
- Dwain's Foodland, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co., 738 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)