SHELTON GARVIN, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Bethel v. Sec. Nat'l Ins. Co., 949 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …contracts are construed in accordance with the plain language of the policies .... ”). Furthermore, under Florida law, the words used in an insurance policy are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning. Rigby v. Underwriters At Lloyd’s, London, 907 So. 2d 1187,1188, n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Giving the words their ordinary import, we conclude that a “family member” is the same thing as a “member of the family” and that this is clear from the plain meaning of the words in the policy. State Farm Fire & Cas.…
• Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London v. Rigby, 934 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 2006)
  …PER CURIAM. We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Rigby v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 907 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) [*1184] of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed. It…
• Durant v. James, 189 So. 3d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
  …the policy as any demand “against an Insured Person for a Wrongful Act.” The fact that Durant and James each meet the policy’s definition of “insured person” was also not disputed. However, Durant relies on Rigby v. Underwriters At Lloyd’s, London, 907 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), for his position that his claim against James is covered by the D & 0 policy because the claim was not brought in Durant’s capacity as a director or former director of the company, but in his personal capacity under a money judgm…

Authorities Cited

• Jordan v. State, 549 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)