ARMANDO CLEMENTE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2005-08-03
No. 3D05-1318
Before GERSTEN, GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ.
907 So. 2d 1267 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Salgado, 22 So. 3d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …due process. See Williams v. Miami-Dade County, 969 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“[W]e are confined to determining whether the lower court provided due process and followed the correct law.”); Loguercio v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 907 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Certiorari review should only be granted when “there has been a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885, 889 (Fla.2003). Clearly…
  • CASA Inv. Co., Inc. v. Marcel Nestor, 8 So. 3d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …aw. A lower tribunal provides due process if the complaining party was given notice and an opportunity to be heard.” Williams v. Miami-Dade County, 969 So. 2d 389, 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); accord Loguercio v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 907 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). As such, certiorari review should only be granted when “there has been a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523, 528 (Fla.1995).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw