MICHAEL E. GLOVER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Deepak Bist v. State, 35 So. 3d 936 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …o suggestion that Bist did not voluntarily engage in the conversations or that the transcribed contents are anything but accurate. Further, the mere failure to supervise or monitor Perverted Justice does not violate due process. See State v. Lopez, 908 So. 2d 484, 485 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) [*941] (holding that “failure to properly supervise the confidential informant, standing alone, did not amount to a due process violation”); State v. Figuereo, 761 So. 2d 1252, 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (same). It is a lack of…
• Robinson v. State, 936 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …oom. See Thames v. State, 366 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Challenging the denial of his motion for JOA on Counts Two and Four, Appellant relies on several decisions that are materially distinguishable on their facts. See, e.g., State v. Lopez, 908 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (affirming entry of JOA after jury verdict finding defendant guilty of trafficking in drug MDMA, because evidence that passenger, who was purported owner and supplier of MDMA, had thrown MDMA out of defendant’s car was legally in…
• Cline v. State, 958 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …ing as an undercover agent of law enforcement, and his conduct in pushing the defendant into the transaction was deemed governmental conduct which could not be condoned. Other cases have rejected the objective entrapment defense. In State v. Lopez, 908 So. 2d 484, 485 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citing State v. Figuereo, 761 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)), we agreed with the state “that the alleged failure to properly [*965] supervise the confidential informant, standing alone, did not amount to a due process viol…

Authorities Cited

• Kearse v. State, 858 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)