KIP A. STERLING, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Blades v. State, 943 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …ch, in essence, found the father in contempt and ordered him to produce discovery or be subject to possible sanctions. The order in question is a non-final, non-appealable order.3 See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3); Gleicher v. Claims Verification Inc., 908 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)(holding that discovery order is a non-final, non-appealable order); Stewart v. Mussoline, 487 So. 2d 96, 97 n. * (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)(“We have jurisdiction to review this action by certiorari under Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(A), an…
• City OF Panama City v. Andina, Inc., 63 So. 3d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …n the counts in Appellees’ complaint seeking injunctive and mandamus relief. The order does not enter judgment on those counts, nor does the order direct the City to take, or refrain from taking, any action. See Gleicher v. Claims Verification Inc., 908 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (explaining that an order that “does not yet enjoin anyone” and that does not have the “practical effect” of an injunction is not renewable under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B)); Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, P.A. v. West Fla. Reg’l…
• Bloomgarden v. Mandel, 154 So. 3d 451 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
  …eview the Order on Appeal. Florida’s appellate courts, however, have an independent duty to determine the existence of jurisdiction in every case and must dismiss those cases over which there is no jurisdiction. Gleicher v. Claims Verification Inc., 908 So. 2d 560, 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Prior to oral argument, we issued the parties an order to be prepared to argue whether this Court has jurisdiction to review the Order on Appeal. The parties either assert or suggest three alternate arguments as to why th…