KENNETH L. DARDEN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• T.G. and W.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 927 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …nary purposes does not in itself constitute abuse when it does not result in harm to the child. § 39.01(2), Fla. Stat. (2005); see M.F., 770 So. 2d at 1192 (explaining purposes of Florida Juvenile Justice Act); A.A. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 908 So. 2d 585, 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“Long ago, the Florida courts recognized the common law principle, which remains with us to the present day, that parents may administer corporal discipline to their children; provided, however, that the discipline is reaso…
• G.C. v. R.S. (parent) and K.C. (minor), 71 So. 3d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …ng domestic violence injunctions does not expressly incorporate the common law principle “that parents may administer corporal discipline to their children; provided, however, that the discipline is reasonable,” A.A. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 908 So. 2d 585, 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), neither does it exclude the common law defense. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2010) (common law remains in effect unless expressly abolished by the legislature). In Moore v. Pattin, 983 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), the Fourth…
• In the Interest of S.T. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 940 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …o J.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 773 So. 2d 1220, 1221 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (no evidence that bruises resulting from spanking with a belt were significant or that they constituted temporary disfigurement); A.A. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 908 So. 2d 585, 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“no evidence that the [child’s] brother administered excessive or abusive corporal discipline to [the child, at the mother’s behest] because there is no evidence that [the child] was injured by significant bruises or welts…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Walker v. State, 428 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)