RICKY T. MILLS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2005-08-24
No. 2D05-1591
SILBERMAN, KELLY, and CANADY, JJ., concur.
908 So. 2d 1168 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to the Appellant seeking appropriate relief in the proper forum. See Canty v. State, 884 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Armstrong v. State, 846 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and CANADY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shields v. State, 59 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …nd conclusions of law with respect thereto.” (emphasis added). Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to make the required findings of fact and conclusions of law on those claims considered at the evidentiary hearing. Miller v. State, 908 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Thomas v. State, 954 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Affirmed in part, Reversed and Remanded in part with instructions. POLEN, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw