MARK L. STREET, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARK L. STREET, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
909 So. 2d 604
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Although it does not appear that appellant previously raised these specific Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 claims, as the trial court’s order suggests, the issues raised are meritless nonetheless. See Studnicka v. State, 679 So. 2d 819, 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (stating that habitual felony offender sentence pronounced after October 1, 1988 is not a sentence governed by sentencing guidelines); Cooper v. State, 902 So. 2d 945, 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (any error in guidelines scoresheet harmless when defendant is sentenced as habitual offender). Furthermore, appellant agreed to a negotiated plea and sentence.
Affirmed.
STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McGEE v. State, 19 So. 3d 1074 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…e also claims that his scoresheet contained errors in it which should have been corrected. As the state correctly observes, any error in a guidelines scoresheet is harmless when the defendant is sentenced as a habitual offender. See Street v. State, 909 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the convictions and sentences. POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Cooper v. State, 902 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
- Studnicka v. State, 679 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)