STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. MAULE INDUSTRIES, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
HONORABLE GEORGE E. HOLT, AS JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; E. B. LEATHERMAN, AS CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; SEMINOLE ROCK AND SAND COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION; SEMINOLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; AND HAILE MINES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS
STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. MAULE INDUSTRIES, INC., PETITIONER,
HONORABLE GEORGE E. HOLT, AS JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; E. B. LEATHERMAN, AS CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; SEMINOLE ROCK AND SAND COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION; SEMINOLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; AND HAILE MINES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS
91 So. 2d 312
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Justice.
This cause having been rendered moot by the granting of the petition for writ of certiorari in the companion case of Maule Industries, Inc., v. Seminole Rock and Sand Company, 91 So. 2d 307, the Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition and all other motions are denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Power & Light Co. v. The Canal Auth. OF the State OF Fla., 423 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)…obate matter, as a matter of law, was in Broward County, not Dade County, writ was properly granted since county judge’s jurisdiction was not sufficiently invoked), and even condemnation suits. See, e.g., Cravero v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, 91 So. 2d 312 (Fla.1956) (where part of land subject to contract for sale was condemned, the trial court did have jurisdiction to determine the disputed ownership rights in the condemned land, but did not have jurisdiction to determine disputed ownership rights i…
-
Lovett v. The City OF Jacksonville Beach, 187 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)…t benefit of jury. Baldwin v. Miami Mercantile Center, Inc., 145 So. 2d 881 (Fla.App.1962); Parker v. Armstrong, 125 So. 2d 138 (Fla.App.1960) ; Rich v. Harper Neon Company, 124 So. 2d 750 (Fla.App.1960); Cravero v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, 91 So. 2d 312 (Fla.1956). 2. Appellant’s Point II, supra, is without merit. Property subject to a lease is “encumbered” thereby. Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, defines encumbrance as “Any right to, or interest in, land which may subsist in another to th…
-
Tampa Suburban Utils. Corp. v. Hillsborough Cnty. Aviation Auth., 195 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)…oncerning interest in the property, includ [*570] ing liens thereon, is determined by the court in the same action after the jury has rendered a verdict for the value of the property as a whole. Cravero v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, Fla.1956, 91 So. 2d 312; Porter v. Columbia County, Fla.1954, 75 So. 2d 699. The statute authorizing interventions was not intended to allow parties to intervene who had no interest in the specific property sought to be condemned, but had other property rights adversely af…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Maule Indus., Inc. v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 91 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 1956)