CHARLES MORRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA AND NATHAN MAYO, AS CUSTODIAN OF THE FLORIDA STATE PRISON, APPELLEE
CHARLES MORRIS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA AND NATHAN MAYO, AS CUSTODIAN OF THE FLORIDA STATE PRISON, APPELLEE
91 So. 2d 640
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Caution
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to he heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said Motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, and ROBERTS, THORNAL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Krug v. Meros, 468 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…arties or their privies from relitigating in the second suit issues common to both causes of action which were actually presented, fully litigated, and resolved in the first suit. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Shevin, 354 So. 2d 372 (Fla.1977); Field v. Field, 91 So. 2d 640 (Fla.1956); Youngblood v. Taylor, 89 So. 2d 503 (Fla.1956); Gordon; Lorf v. Indiana Insurance Co., 426 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Sunshine Utilities Equipment, Inc. v. Treasure Coast Utilities, Inc., 421 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Steven…
-
LEE v. Emmett LEE, 105 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Field v. Field, Fla.1956, 91 So. 2d 640; Gordon v. Gordon, Fla.1952, 59 So. 2d 40; Bagwell v. Bagwell, 153 Fla. 471, 14 So. 2d 841; Prall v. Prall, 58 Fla. 496, 50 So. 867, 26 L.R.A.,N.S., 577. STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.…
-
Orange Julius Realty Corp. v. Sunshine TOY Ctr., Inc., 251 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)…amed for trial upon the refiled complaint, therefore, the court did not err in holding that appellant was bound by the determination [*683] of the issue and could not again litigate it in a trial upon the refiled complaint. Field v. Field, Fla.1956, 91 So. 2d 640. Appellants’ appeal from the judgment on the counterclaim presents several points each of which is directed to the sufficiency of the evidence in one particular or the other. We hold that we are not able to consider these points because we do not h…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence