F. K. G. COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
KEYS BOTTLED GAS COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1957-01-11
TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
91 So. 2d 857 Florida Supreme Court (1957) Negative Treatment
Cited by 43 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 'of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed-that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed . from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is ,

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (43 total)

  • Hoffman v. Jones, 280 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1973)
    …Therein, this Court also reaffirmed the principle that the common law, if not abrogated by statute or constitutional provision, is in full force and effect in this state. See also Bryan v. Landis, 106 Fla. 19, 142 So. 650 (1932), Wilson v. Renfroe, 91 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1957), Brooks v. City of West Miami, 246 So. 2d 115 (Fla.App.1971). It is the statutory law of this state that, “The common and statute laws of England which are of a general and not a local nature, with the exception hereinafter mentioned, d…
  • Livingston v. State, 441 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1983)
    …n. Although such a pre-judgment order is not appealable, the moving party can seek review by petitioning the court with appellate jurisdiction for a writ of prohibition. See, e.g., Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So. 2d 440 (Fla.1978); Wilson v. [*1089] Renfroe, 91 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1956); State ex rel. Davis v. Parks, 141 Fla. 516, 194 So. 613 (1939); Dickenson v. Parks, 104 Fla. 577, 140 So. 459 (1932); State ex rel. Zacke v. Woodson, 399 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). The writ of prohibition affords a means of reviewing…
  • …Davis v. Parks, 141 Fla. 516, 194 So. 613 (1939); State ex rel. Brown v. Dewell, 131 Fla. 566, 179 So. 695 (1938). A verified motion for disqualification must contain an actual factual foundation for the alleged fear of prejudice. Wilson v. Renfroe, 91 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1956); Wyman v. Reasbeck, 436 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find that petitioner’s subjective fears, as alleged, are not “reasonably sufficient” to justify a “well-founded fear” of prejudice. To the contrary, the allegations are frivolous…

Previewing 3 of 43 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw