KERRIGAN
v.
KERRIGAN

Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. | 1963-03-13
No. 63-949-E
21 Fla. Supp. 15 Duval County Circuit Court (1963)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

In this 1963 Florida case, the court modified a divorce decree by eliminating the ex-wife's alimony obligation after she shot her ex-husband and was convicted of aggravated assault, finding she had forfeited her right to alimony through her criminal conduct.


Holding

The court held that the plaintiff forfeited her right to alimony as a matter of law and fact due to her criminal assault on the defendant, and that the changed circumstances of the parties warranted striking the alimony provision from the final decree.


Key Quotes

“Based on the foregoing findings of fact this court is of the opinion that as a matter of law and fact the plaintiff has forfeited her right to the alimony provision of said final decree”

Establishes the court's legal conclusion that criminal assault by an alimony obligee constitutes forfeiture of alimony rights

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

A final divorce decree was entered on October 3, 1962, awarding the plaintiff permanent alimony of $25 per week. The defendant made required payments …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM H. MANESS, Circuit Judge.

WILLIAM H. MANESS, Circuit Judge.

Order modifying final decree of circuit court of third judicial circuit in and for Taylor County: This cause came on to be heard *16on the rule to show cause heretofore issued herein pursuant to plaintiff’s petition therefor and also on defendant’s petition for modification of final decree. At said hearing the court heard the testimony of the plaintiff and the defendant and finds therefrom as follows —

That by the final decree of the circuit court of the third judicial circuit a final decree of divorce was entered on October 3, 1962 divorcing the parties and awarding to the plaintiff permanent alimony in the amount of $25 per week; that at the time of the entry of the final decree the defendant was on parole from the Florida State Prison and was employed; that following the entry of the final decree the defendant made the required alimony payments from October 5th through November 26th, on which date the last payment was made, and since said date 15 payments of $25 each have accrued through March 11, 1963; that on December 4, 1962 the plaintiff shot the defendant with a .22 pistol, striking him in the shoulder as a result of which the defendant incurred $60 hospitalization, approximately $30 to $50 in doctor bills, and asserts that due to his inability to work suffered a further loss of $270 in his business; that the plaintiff was charged with assault to commit murder and on March 11, 1963 pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and was placed on probation by the circuit court of the third judicial circuit in and for Taylor County for a period of three years; that there are no children involved in this proceeding and none born as a result of said marriage.

Based on the foregoing findings of fact this court is of the opinion that as a matter of law and fact the plaintiff has forfeited her right to the alimony provision of said final decree and this court finds that the circumstances of the parties have changed and that said petition for modification should be granted and the alimony provision of said final decree stricken.

Accordingly, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows —

(1) That said rule to show cause be, and the same is, hereby dissolved without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to apply for a money judgment for the sums now due under said final decree.

(2) That defendant’s petition for modification should be, and the same is, hereby granted and the final decree of the circuit court of the third judicial circuit of Florida in and for Taylor County, wherein Christine D. Kerrigan is plaintiff and George L. Kerrigan, defendant, entered October 3, 1962 and recorded in official records volume 37 at page 385 should be, and the same is, hereby modified by striking therefrom the provision thereof granting plaintiff permanent alimony.

*17(3) That the clerk of this court shall transmit to the clerk of said circuit court, Taylor County, Florida, a copy of this order modifying said final decree.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw