A.A.C., A CHILD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ira C. King, III v. State, 46 So. 3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …ted them by reference in the written order. Defendant is correct. If a trial court revokes a defendant’s probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated. See Delisa v. State, 910 So. 2d 418, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Defontes v. State, 889 So. 2d 217, 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Anderson v. State, 879 So. 2d 688, 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1036, 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Because the order of revocation of probat…
• Pickles v. State, 976 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …the trial court erred in failing to conduct a competency hearing in light of his behavior throughout the trial. We review determinations of the trial court not to hold a competency hearing under an abuse of discretion standard. See Delisa v. State, 910 So. 2d 418, 420 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). “To hold criminal proceedings when a defendant is mentally incompetent would deny that defendant his constitutional right to a fair trial.” Kelly v. State, 797 So. 2d 1278, 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In Hill v. State, the s…
• Renard Nealie Williams v. State, 134 So. 3d 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …determine, that the order finding Appellant competent is dispositive. Precedent holds, and we agree, that an order finding a defendant competent is not legally dispositive. Burns v. State, 884 So. 2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Delisa v. State, 910 So. 2d 418, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“[Competency fe not a dispositive issue since it only precludes the trial from immediately proceeding.”); Fuller, 748 So. 2d at 294 (“An order determining a defendant competent does not preclude an immediate trial; trial pr…

Authorities Cited

• Walker v. State, 384 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
• Kent v. State, 702 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
• Lavender v. State, 650 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)