ARTHUR LEE BATTEN, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ARTHUR LEE BATTEN, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
910 So. 2d 871
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied as both successive and procedurally barred. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B); Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(C).
KAHN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fortune v. Fortune, 61 So. 3d 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…well settled that affidavits are not admissible to prove facts in issue at an evidentiary hearing because they are not subject to cross-examination and because they impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the other party. B.C.S., S.r.l. v. Wise, 910 So. 2d 871, 874 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). This loan was a critical piece of the equitable distribution scheme. By allowing the husband to introduce Mr. Cen-drowski’s affidavit without calling Mr. Cendrowski as a witness, the trial court denied the wife the right t…
-
B.C.S. v. Wise, 989 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…teering system was delivered to Dennis Distributors in March of 1997 and Taylor purchased it from them at that time. The unit came with an English Installation Manual, and Taylor personally installed the product on his boat. B.C.S., S.r.l. v. Wise, 910 So. 2d 871, 872-73 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). There was no evidence that there were any Hydraflex systems sold in Florida other than the three units purchased by Dennis Distributors. In our prior opinion, this court reversed the trial court’s order determining that…