FRANK A. MOSLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pending Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his rule 3.800(a) motion for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court found that because the appellant has a pending appeal of the trial court’s order denying his rule 3.850 motion, the trial court was without jurisdiction to hear the appellant’s instant postconviction motion. However, because the issues presented in the instant rule 3.800(a) motion are separate and distinct from those presented in his rule 3.850 motion, the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain the appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. See Bates v. State, 704 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Kimmel v. State, 629 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, the trial court’s order is reversed and the appellant’s motion is remanded to the trial court for consideration on the merits.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
BENTON, PADOVANO, and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Contreras, 979 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 2008)…QUINCE, J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Contreras v. State, 910 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). The district court certified that its decision is in direct conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Blanton v. State, 880 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), approved, 978 So. 2d 149 (Fla.2008), on the issue o…1 / 2
-
Belvin v. State, 922 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…ailable for deposition at some time before the trial. As these possibilities illustrate, the taking of a discovery deposition cannot be treated as a proceeding that affords an opportunity for cross-examination. Id. Recently, in Contreras v. State, 910 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), we certified conflict with Blanton. There, we held that a video statement of the child victim in a sexual battery case failed to satisfy the requirements of Crawford and the Sixth Amendment. We disagreed with the state that the…1 / 2
-
State v. Belvin, 986 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 2008)…t have no burden to produce constitutionally necessary evidence of guilt, but he has the right to stand silent during the state’s case in chief, all the while insisting that the state’s proof satisfy constitutional requirements.” Contreras v. State, 910 So. 2d 901, 908 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), approved in part and quashed in part, 979 So. 2d 896 (Fla.2008). Because Crawford’s requirement of a prior opportunity for cross-examination has not been satisfied, the admission of those portions of the breath test affida…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bates v. State, 704 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Kimmel v. State, 629 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)