SCOTT B. FOSTER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Andrews v. Frey, 66 So. 3d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
  …cal and unambiguous language indicating the sole offeror was Shannon Frey. Further, Appellants never objected to this error and the issue has not been preserved for this court’s review.) See Clear Channel Commc'ns, Inc. v. City of North Bay Village, 911 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). . In her concurring opinion in Dryden v. Pedemonti, 910 So. 2d 854, 858 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), Judge Griffin suggested that the only [*380] permissible nonmonetary conditions were those the offeror would be entitled to by operatio…
• Ferrara v. Cmty. Developers, Ltd., 917 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …GREEN, J. (concurring). I concur in the result only based upon Miami-Dade County v. Omnipoint Holdings, Inc., 863 So. 2d 195 (Fla.2003); Clear Channel Communications, Inc. v. City of North Bay Village, 911 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Kitchen v. State, 965 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …urred.” § 910.05, Fla. Stat. “Appellate review is confined ■ to issues decided adversely to appellánt’s position, or issues that were preserved with a sufficiently specific objection below.” Clear Channel Comme’ns, Inc. v. City of North Bay Village, 911 So. 2d 188, 189-90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Kitchen did not raise this issue below, and in fact, defense counsel affirmatively agreed there was no objection to the case being tried in St. Lucie County. We find that defense counsel’s explicit acceptance of the tria…

Authorities Cited

• Daron Merritt v. State, 814 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2002)