BARRINGTON CHRISTIE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BARRINGTON CHRISTIE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
912 So. 2d 349
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Glass v. State, 900 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Richbell v. Ernst Toussaint, 221 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…son and $300,000 per incident for bodily injury, with additional limits for economic damages depending on the permissive user’s insurance coverage. The “per person” limit applies per person injured, not per claimant. See Lewis v. Enter. Leasing Co., 912 So. 2d 349, 351 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). We have previously applied the term “loan” consistent with the statute’s purpose. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Dollar Sys., Inc., 699 So. 2d 1028, 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We interpreted an insurance policy provision that ex…
Authorities Cited
- Idus L. Glass v. State, 900 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)