JEFFREY CEFALO, APPELLANT,

v.

AMY JEAN CEFALO, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Schlagel v. Schlagel, 973 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …e Husband had previously made of $88,000 and an automobile worth $2500. The standard of review concerning a trial court’s imputation of income is whether competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s decision. Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 912 So. 2d 363, 368 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Hinton v. Smith, 725 So. 2d 1154, 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Here, the parties stipulated to the vocational expert’s report being admitted into evidence without his testimony at the final hearing. The report contains competent…
• Geoghegan v. Geoghegan, 969 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …eficial purposes) on the part of the Husband, and as they reduce the apparent annual income available to the Husband, they should have been considered by the trial court in making the ability-to-pay alimony calculation. Cf. Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 912 So. 2d 363, 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Copeland v. Copeland, 667 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Finally, we must also consider the judgment as it relates to the Wife’s need. Once again, we are unable to reconcile how this aspect of the equation was determined b…
• Marshall-Beasley v. Beasley, 77 So. 3d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …lity for years prior to and during the pendency of this divorce litigation.” The judge’s finding that Former Wife is capable of earning $50,000 a year is reasonable and supported by competent substantial trial evidence. See Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 912 So. 2d 363, 368 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (finding, when former wife had an earning history of up to $57,000 a year, a vocational expert’s testimony was competent substantial evidence that former wife could be imputed $40,900 earning capability a year). Bridge-the-G…