TERRY MOORE, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg. v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, Inc., 967 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 2007)
  …ANSTEAD, J. We have on appeal a decision of a district court of appeal declaring invalid a state statute. State Dep’t of Bus. & Prof'l Reg. v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass’n, Inc., 912 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. The issue before this Court is whether section 550.615(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), is unconstitutional as a special law enacted in the guise of a general law and wit…
• ST. Vincent's Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Mem'l Healthcare Grp., Inc., 967 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 2007)
  …able possibility” that the exemption could apply to any other party before it expired. Id. at 435. The First District relied upon its earlier opinion in Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass’n., Inc., 912 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), aff'd, Nos. SC05-2130 & SC05-2131, 967 So. 2d 802, 2007 WL 2492308 (Fla. Sept. 6, 2007), emphasizing that, based upon Gulfstream Park, “the proper standard [in determining whether a law is an unconstitutional special law] is whe…
• R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Amanda Jean Hall for the Estate of Arthur Hall Sr., 67 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …efitted one facility. See 434 So. 2d at 882. Rather, the “controlling point” was whether the statute had the potential to apply to other facilities in the future. Id.; see also Dept. of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass’n, Inc., 912 So. 2d 616, 621-22 (Fla. [*1092] 2005) (“Whether a statute is a special law depends on its potential applicability to others who may come within the regulated class.... The critical question is not one of legislative intent; rather, it is whether the class reg…

Authorities Cited

• Denhart v. Dugger, 567 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)