RANDALL C. SUTTERFIELD, PRO SE, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
RANDALL C. SUTTERFIELD, PRO SE, APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
912 So. 2d 645
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED, without prejudice to Sut-terfield’s right to seek relief in circuit court. Compare Caldwell v. State, 821 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), and Quigley v. Fla. Dep’t of Corrections, 745 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), with Bass v. Dep’t of Corrections, 684 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Quigley v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 745 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Bass v. Dep't OF Corr., 684 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- Caldwell v. State, 821 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)