PASCO COUNTY BOCC AND COMMERCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT, APPELLANTS,

v.

GEORGE PETERSON, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• A.M.P. v. State, 927 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …hermore, an adjudication of delinquency does not qualify as a “conviction” for the purposes of section 775.083, which allows the imposition of varying fines for the. conviction of varying degrees of criminal offenses. See J.S., supra; State v. N.P., 913 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (finding of delinquency was not “conviction,” for purpose of statute requiring imposition of fine for criminal mischief [*101] conviction). Nonetheless, as is argued by the State, the issue is not cognizable on appeal because of t…
• D.A. v. State, 11 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …35(6), Fla. Stat. (2007) ; see also A.M.P. v. State, 927 [*424] So. 2d 97, 100 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (stating that “an adjudication of delinquency does not qualify as a ‘conviction’ for purposes of section 775.083”) (Florida Statutes); State v. N.P., 913 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (stating that juveniles are not deemed to be “convicted” by adjudications of delinquency). Thus, section 938.27, Florida Statutes (2007), which expressly applies to all “convicted persons” in “criminal cases”, does not apply to…
• State v. J.C., 916 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
  …iscussed above, a delinquent act is by definition a “violation of any law.” § 985.03(58). Therefore, by imposing surcharges for a “violation” in sections 938.08 and 938.085, the legislature specifically included juvenile offenses. Cf. State v. N.P., 913 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (finding that the fine in section 806.13(6)(a) did not apply to juveniles because the language of the statute applied to individuals who have been “convicted ” and “juveniles are not deemed to be ‘convicted’ by adjudications of…

Authorities Cited

• Seminole Cnty. Sheriff's Off. & Johns E. Co., Inc. v. Johnson, 901 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)