JONATHON SELLERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JONATHON SELLERS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
913 So. 2d 79
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment and sentence are affirmed; however, the cause is remanded to correct the order revoking probation to delete the references to violations of conditions 2 arid 10 of probation.
AFFIRMED.
KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ferreira v. Home Depot/Sedgwick CMS, 12 So. 3d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…because it renders essential terms void and constitutes an impermissible rewrite of the parties’ agreement. The standard of review with respect to a JCC’s interpretation of a written settlement agreement is de novo. Klatt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 913 So. 2d 79, 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Interpretation of settlement agreements is governed by contract law. See Munroe v. U.S. Food Serv., 985 So. 2d 654, 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Contracts are to be construed in accordance with the plain meaning of the words con…
-
Raban v. Fed. Express & Sedgwick CMS, 13 So. 3d 140 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…ht of the October 15, 2007, order ruling penalties and interest would be due if payment of the settlement proceeds was late. Condition Precedent Review of a JCC’s interpretation of a settlement agreement is de novo. Klatt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 913 So. 2d 79, 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). “Provisions of a contract will only be considered conditions precedent or subsequent where the express wording of the disputed provision conditions formation of a contract and or performance of the contract on the completion…
-
Holcombe v. City of Naples/Johns E. Co., Inc. (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)