DANNY THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DANNY THOMAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
913 So. 2d 88
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005)
Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Tucker v. State, 726 So. 2d 768, 771-772 (Fla.1999) (holding that a defendant can be sentenced pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provided the verdict form itself contains an “express reference to the use of a firearm” in the commission of the crime, and a special verdict form need not be used).
SHARP, W„ THOMPSON .and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Universal Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State, 929 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…WELLS, Judge. Universal Bail Bonds, Inc. and Indiana Lumbermans Insurance Co., collectively referred to as Universal, appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside or to discharge a bond estreature. See Mike Snapp Bail Bonds v. Orange County, 913 So. 2d 88, 91 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (confirming that once a final appealable order or judgment has been rendered, a bonding company may address on appeal the intermediate steps culminating, in the final order or judgment). We affirm. Osvaldo Palmer was charged…
-
Cardoza v. State, 98 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…the statute’s plain language for legislative intent or resort to rules of statutory construction to ascertain intent.” Daniels v. Fla. Dep’t of Health, 898 So. 2d 61, 64 (Fla.2005). The majority’s reliance on Mike Snapp Bail Bonds v. Orange County, 913 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), is misplaced. In Mike Snapp, the surety initially filed a motion to set aside a forfeiture (pursuant to sections 903.26 and 903.28), not a motion to vacate a final judgment. The surety contended that the forfeiture (as in this c…1 / 2
-
Polakoff & Aabbott Bail Bonds v. State, 111 So. 3d 253 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…res, Polakoff embarked upon an unehartered procedural path that led to an order that is not reviewable. Polakoff argues that this court has affixed its judicial imprimatur to the procedure it followed, citing Mike Snapp Bail Bonds v. Orange County, 913 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), to support that contention. Our reading of Snapp leads us to conclude that Snapp neither approves of the procedural course Polakoff took nor dictates an answer to the jurisdictional question before us. Snapp is so factually diff…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tucker v. State, 726 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1999)