THOMAS JORDAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2005-11-04
No. 5D05-187
PLEUS, C.J., SHARP, W„ J., and SEMENTO, L.J. Associate Judge, concur.
913 So. 2d 744 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(B)

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(B) cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Jordan appeals from an order denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), in which he asserts he was entitled to a new sentencing because the judge who sentenced him after a violation of probation hearing and revocation of his probation, was not the same judge who presided over his criminal trial and imposed his original sentence, and there was no showing of necessity, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700.

We recently issued an opinion in Scott v. State, 909 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), which addressed these issues and resolved them contrary to Jordan’s position. We find this case factually indistinguishable from Scott. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., SHARP, W„ J., and SEMENTO, L.J. Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Sherman v. State, 922 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Golden v. State, 913 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). SHARP, W., SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.…
  • Collins v. State, 931 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …[*996] PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Golden v. State, 913 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), review denied, 925 So. 2d 1030 (Fla.2006). GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw