PEDRO CHIRINO, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Lakeary Heck v. State, 966 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …results in an unfair windfall to the defendant if one of the convictions is vacated and, then, at some subsequent point in time, the remaining conviction is overturned. To illustrate its point, the State cites the circumstances in State v. Cameron, 914 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). There, six people died because the defendant, who was under the influence of alcohol and driving at a high rate of speed, crashed his boat into theirs. A jury found the defendant guilty of six counts of manslaughter while operat…
• Rigueiro v. State, 23 So. 3d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …within 60 days of a mandate. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(c). At the time the defendant in this case attempted to meet the two-year time limit for filing his Rule 9.141 petition, this Court had lost its jurisdiction to recall its mandate. State v. Cameron, 914 So. 2d 4, 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ("An appellate court’s power to recall its mandate is limited to the term during which it was issued.”).…

Authorities Cited

• Aurigemma v. State, 801 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)