ROBERT D. FULKS, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT D. FULKS, SR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
914 So. 2d 470
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Edler v. State, 673 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Parks v. State, 43 So. 3d 858 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…941.45(3) [*862] will enable a defendant to seek relief under ... [the IADA]”); Fay, 763 So. 2d at 475 (“[s]ubstantial compliance with the requirements of section 941.45(3) is sufficient to invoke the benefits of the IAD”); see also Halle v. State, 914 So. 2d 470, 471-72 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Cf. Torres-Arboledo v. State, 524 So. 2d 403, 412 (Fla.1988). In Roberts, the defendant, rather than corrections officials, had sent documents that did not include a certificate of inmate status. 427 So. 2d at 789. The…
Authorities Cited
- Sanders v. State, 673 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- Edler v. State, 673 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)