PHILLIP A. GOOLSBY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Clivens Goldman v. Campbell, 920 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …usually applied in the cases actually ends up visiting even more unfairness on some claimants who are deprived of fees because of a “technical defect” or “procedural irregularity” in an offer that had no effect on the offeree.9 See Hauss v. Waxman, 914 So. 2d 474, 475-79 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (Farmer, J., concurring) (failure to identify section 768.79 in otherwise qualifying offer had no effect on offeree who had preceded such offer with its own offer obviously intended merely to set up right to attorneys fee…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Brenda "Elaine" Easters v. Barbara Russell, M.D., 942 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …olding in RDR Computer Consulting Corp. v. Eurodirect, Inc., 884 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), was implicitly overruled in Lamb. . We are aware that Judge Farmer believes that this rule does not need to be strictly construed. See Hauss v. Waxman, 914 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (Farmer, J., concurring); see also Goldman v. Campbell, 920 So. 2d 1264, 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (Farmer, J., concurring).…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Kahmke, 468 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)