WILLIE H. GLASCO, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Willie Glaseo appealed the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, arguing he was subjected to double jeopardy by being convicted of multiple sexual battery crimes arising from a single episode and that his scoresheet contained erroneous victim injury points. The court affirmed the denial and prohibited Glaseo from filing further pro se pleadings in this case, finding his petition frivolous and an abuse of process.
The court affirmed the denial of Glaseo's motion and found his petition frivolous and an abuse of process. The court prohibited Glaseo from filing further pro se pleadings concerning his convictions and sentences in this case.
[1] A court may prohibit a defendant from filing further pro se pleadings concerning a specific conviction and sentence when the defendant repeatedly raises frivolous claims…
[2] A court may direct its Clerk to refuse to accept further pro se filings from a specific defendant concerning a particular case, unless filed by a member of The Florida Ba…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We view this petition as frivolous and an abuse of process.”
The court's characterization of Glaseo's repeated filings with essentially identical arguments as frivolous and abusive.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGlaseo was convicted of multiple sexual battery crimes in Hernando County Case No. 90-504-CF. He filed multiple motions to correct his sentence, argui…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.800(A) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Willie H. Glaseo, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his latest rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. He repeats the arguments presented in previous motions that he was placed in double jeopardy when he was found guilty of multiple sexual battery crimes when he should have been convicted of only one crime committed during a single episode. He also complains that his score sheet erroneously reflected excess victim injury points. Contrary to his response to this court’s show cause order under State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999), both the trial court and this court have considered and denied his claims on the merits on more than one occasion, although in slightly different permutations. See Glasco v. State, 642 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Glasco v. State, 656 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Glasco v. State, 892 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
We view this petition as frivolous and an abuse of process. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (opining “Enough is enough.”); Henderson v. State, 903 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (recognizing frivolous criminal appeals clog the courts and, worse, hurt meritorious criminal appeals by inviting sweeping rulings and by engendering judicial impatience with the entire class of criminal defendants).
Accordingly, we prohibit Willie H. Glas-eo, Jr., from filing with this Court any further pro se pleadings concerning the convictions and sentences he received in the Hernando County Fifth Judicial Circuit Court Case No. 90-504-CF. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se documents concerning this case from Glaseo. Any further filings regarding this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk of this Court, unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. The Clerk of this Court is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution as provided in section 944.09, Florida Statutes. See Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED; Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED.
PETERSON, GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Anselm Lamonte Wallace v. State, 931 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…(Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. We further conclude that the instant motions are frivolous and an abuse of process. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (explaining: “Enough is enough.”); see also Glasco v. State, 914 So. 2d 512, 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (explaining that frivolous collateral appeals clog the courts and hurt meritorious appeals by inviting sweeping rulings and by engendering judicial impatience with all defendants); Henderson v. State, 903 So. 2d 999, 1000 (F…
-
Napoleon Britt v. State, 931 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…s argument that he received an improper general sentence. Britt’s pro se filings have become frivolous, an abuse of process, and a waste of the taxpayers’ money. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). See also Glasco v. State, 914 So. 2d 512, 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (recognizing that frivolous collateral appeals clog the courts and hurt meritorious appeals by inviting sweeping rulings and by engendering judicial impatience); Freeman v. State, 885 So. 2d 477, 478 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (not…
-
Weidmann v. State, 934 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…also Elliott v. Elliott, 648 So. 2d 137, 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We conclude that the present motion is frivolous and an abuse of process. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”); see also Glasco v. State, 914 So. 2d 512, 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (recognizing frivolous collateral appeals clog the courts and hurt meritorious appeals by inviting sweeping rulings and by engendering judicial impatience with all defendants); Henderson v. State, 903 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla.…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
- Henderson v. State, 903 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
- Glasco v. State, 656 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)