K.O., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2005-11-23
No. 3D05-1729
Before COPE, C.J., and GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
914 So. 2d 1044 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

K.O. appeals an order adjudicating him to be delinquent. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

K.O. argues that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him of the charge of aggravated assault. We affirm on authority of L.R.W. v. State, 848 So. 2d 1263, 1266 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

The State concedes that there is an error in the adjudicatory order. On count two, the charge of criminal mischief, the State acknowledges that the charge must be reduced to specify that the damage was under $200. See § 806.13(l)(b)l., Fla. Stat. (2004).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of adjudicatory order.*

*

K.O. does not challenge the adjudication of delinquency on count one, the charge of throwing a deadly missile in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2004).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Liansy C. Carbonell v. Glade, 394 So. 3d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
  • Winer Mathieu v. City OF Lauderdale Lakes, 961 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
    …ding that lien created by code enforcement board order was not a “judgment, decree or execution” under Art. X, § 4, Fla. Const., and thus did not “constitute a cloud upon Miskin’s homestead property”); see also Pelecanos v. City of Hallandale Beach, 914 So. 2d 1044, 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (recognizing that a municipal code enforcement lien is not one of the specified exceptions). Since code enforcement liens do not defeat homestead protection and the property has not yet been sold through foreclosure, Mathi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw